A conference in Jerusalem dealing with problems in applying international law during armed conflict analyzed Israel’s moral conduct in war, how to prevent civilian casualties and international bias against Israel.

Shurat HaDin Israel Law Center, an Israeli NGO specializing in International Law, opened a two-day conference in Jerusalem on Monday, “Towards a New Law of War,” dealing with the rules of armed conflict, their interpretation and application.

Col. (ret.) Richard Kemp, former commander of the UK’s forces in Afghanistan, was one of the prominent participants.Other international contributors included former IDF Chief of Staff Lt.-Gen. (ret.) Benny Gantz and former Deputy Chief of US Special Operations Command, Lt.-Gen. (ret.) David Fridovich, among other legal, military and counter-terrorism experts.

Kemp said that the United Nations, foreign governments and human rights organizations were “deliberately misunderstanding and misrepresenting international laws of armed conflict,” specifically referring to the law of proportionality.

“These organizations and governments are portraying Israel as breaking the laws of armed conflict, which according to my knowledge, they’re not,” Kemp contended.

Terror Organizations’ Use of Human Shields

Meanwhile, he continued, those very same bodies were not adequately holding Hamas responsible for their own clear violations, particularly regarding “human shields.”

Gantz, in his address on Monday, also touched upon this theme, claiming that “both in Gaza and in Lebanon, the enemy operates from within civilian populations.”

“Don’t tell me it’s a kindergarten when I know it’s a rocket warehouse. Don’t tell me it’s a mosque when I know it’s a rocket warehouse,” the former chief of staff argued.

Gantz also called for revisions to the laws that govern armed conflict, insisting that the “bad guys” no longer cared about breaking the rules.

Kemp, taking a different tack, said that he didn’t see a need, or possibility, for changes to the laws themselves. Rather, he contended, there needs to be a reexamination of conventional interpretations to suit the realities of 21st-century conflict.

Panels on the conference’s second day discussed targeted killings and the International Criminal Court (ICC) at The Hague.

On the subject of the ICC, Kemp maintained that Israel should not have to face the court, and not only because he sees the IDF as having acted in accordance with the law. “The ICC is set up for specific circumstances and has jurisdiction where there is no legal system or internal will to examine previous conduct,” he explained.

Kemp, who also led a joint UK-US counterterrorism force in Afghanistan, stated that “Israel has a proven and respected legal process, which stands up to international standards.”

By: Zack Pyzer, Tazpit News Agency