When Palestinians and some of their supporters in the international community say that they want an end to the 'occupation,' they mean they want to see an end to Israel's existence.
With all of the hype surrounding the magical-sounding 'two-state solution,' isn't it time to see whether it could ever live up to the utopian ideal portrayed by politicians.
President Trump presented a very different vision of the US' relationship with Israel, and the rest of the world, than the one promoted by his predecessor Barack Obama.
In Amman, Pence reassured King Abdullah II that the US administration remains committed to reviving Israeli-Palestinian peace talks with Jordan as a main player.
The president of France recently announced a planned visit to Israel, where he said he will promote an agenda that both seeks a "two-state solution" and attempts to fight terror.
The PA asserted that the “united Arab position” was that “there will be no peace without the establishment of a Palestinian state within the ’67 borders.”
Trump enthused about the possibilities for peace during his brief stay in Israel, but made no mention of a two-state solution or an independent Palestinian state.
A senior Palestinian official is urging worldwide protests by Muslims and Christians against moving the US embassy in Israel to the capital, Jerusalem.
Anti-Israel elements are gathering in Paris in another attempt to ambush Israel and pressure it into concessions to the Palestinians, supposedly in a move towards peace.
Secretary of State designate Rex Tillerson blasted the Obama administration, stressing that Israel is America's 'most important ally' in the Middle East.
Since it's not politically correct for a US president to call for the demise of the Jewish state, a death by a thousand UN resolutions will have to suffice.
The UNSC is scheduled to vote on another anti-Israel resolution. Will the Obama administration vote against the resolution, as is the US' traditional policy?