'No side should speak in Wikipedia’s own voice, all articles must not declare a legal conclusion, and should include significant, high-quality sources from all sides.'
First came silence over Hamas’ actions, then came the headlines. Dominated not by Hamas’ violations, but by Israel’s response. By Rinat Harash, HonestReporting They’ve done it again. Just nine days after the media ignored Hamas’ previous ceasefire violations and blamed Israel for acting in self-defense, leading outlets repeated the same distortion. First came silence over... Read more »
This humorous yet educational video questions how the media of today would have handled the reporting on the Jewish exodus from Egypt over 3000 years ago.
In the latest anti-Israel twist of the truth, The New York Times falsely accuses IDF soldiers of using Palestinians as human shields—when it’s Hamas that routinely uses its own people as shields for terror operations. The recent New York Times article recklessly asserts that the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) are using Gazan detainees as human... Read more »
The coverage from several leading news organizations of Sunday’s escalation exemplified how omitting a single crucial detail can distort the entire narrative.
Original headline read, 'UN clears half the aid workers accused of taking part in the October 7 attack.' That's like writing, 'Terrorists spare four of seven buildings at World Trade Center,' according to one commentator.
New commentator Chris Cuomo notes that Hezbollah's attack killing 12 children would have been met with widespread condemnation if the target had not been Israel.
Wikipedia’s volunteer editors have recently classified the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) as an unreliable source on topics related to antisemitism. By Ken Jacobson, Algemeiner The report that Wikipedia’s volunteer editors are labeling the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) as an unreliable source of information on certain topics — including antisemitism related to Israel and Zionism — is a... Read more »
Israeli journalists come under scrutiny as media practices and coverage during the Gaza war spark debate over the portrayal of suffering on both sides. By Rachel O’Donoghue,Honest Reporting The Guardian‘s sister weekly newspaper, The Observer, recently published a feature that took aim at Israeli journalists. Headlined, “‘Journalists see their role as helping to win’: how... Read more »
Sky News military analyst puzzling analysis suggests that Hamas' recent attack aimed to spark international intervention for a two-state solution, disregarding the group's history of violence.
Several international media outlets failed to uphold their journalistic duty by either mislabeling the Israeli victims or by leaving out the Palestinian identity of the perpetrators.
Media watchdog HonestReporting chronicled the media's shamefully misleading coverage of a cold-blooded massacre targeting Jewish Israelis on the Sabbath.
Despite rescinding media restrictions demanding a gag order on rocket malfunctions, Hamas communicates to the press that reporting the truth about terror is a dangerous proposition.
The Times demands absolute transparency for Israel in the middle of a war with a terrorist group dedicated to its destruction, yet gives World Vision a free pass on the point, applying a double standard.
Français
Español
English
Portuguese
