Giving a platform to a Palestinian prisoner and terrorist leader convicted of multiple murders was 'a choice by the editors...a choice by the newspaper.'
Giving a platform to a Palestinian prisoner and terrorist leader convicted of multiple murders was 'a choice by the editors...a choice by the newspaper.'
One of the fine things about the Internet is that even before the story was delivered to print subscribers of the Times, readers have had the chance to rebut it.
The Times coverage of Jews and Israel is about as fair and balanced and accurate and reliable as its coverage of the presidential election was, which is to say, not very.
A New York Times editorial criticized as excessive the 10-year, $38 billion aid agreement signed last week between Israel and the United States. One sign of the anti-Israel bias of the Times is that it uses a different standard to measure military aid to Israel than it uses to measure spending on other things.
The Times’ concern for the plight of the Palestinians is touching, but the editorial fails to explain why that issue should cast a pall over Israel’s diplomatic relations with its neighbors, especially when Israel and its neighbors don’t think it should.
A New York Times video which excised the praise of Um Kamel Taraireh for her son Mohammed, whom she called a 'martyr' and 'hero' after he murdered 13-year-old Hallel Yaffa Ariel, has been corrected after complaints by media watchdog CAMERA.
It’s not clear why the article had to be mainly about the "settlements" at all, rather than simply a feel-good feature about Jews and Arabs working together. The 'Times' unfortunately took the opportunity to fit this one into an existing [and false] narrative about the “occupation.”
For the second time in five months, media watchdog organization CAMERA prompts a New York Times correction of an article which incorrectly referred to Israel "illegally" occupying land.
That the Times took this opportunity to publish a column blaming Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for the lack of peace with the Palestinians cannot be disconnected from Jeffrey Goldberg's recent interview with President Obama.
The Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America (CAMERA) was responding to the biased way a piece that appeared in Tuesday’s “newspaper of record” reported on the current wave of terrorism against Israelis.
As Palestinian terrorists work to murder as many Israelis as possible, foreign media outlets work harder to demonstrate their anti-Israel bias and lack of professionalism by describing the terrorists as victims.
The New York Times continues its history of relegating news about Israeli victims of terror out of sight, while publicizing so-called Palestinian victims on the front page.
A New York Times editor admitted that the publication has an Israel-bias, but defended it. A media watchdog said it is the most criticized section because it is the topic the newspaper “skews most dramatically and consistently.”
Despite the fact that Israel is under attack by Palestinian terrorists, the mainstream media is instead manipulating headlines and stories to whitewash terrorism and garner sympathy for the Palestinian people.
The New York Times recently published an article that was so appallingly flawed and dangerous that it simply beggars belief. Its subsequent "clarification" only serves to highlight how bad it was.
Alexander Levlovich was driving through Jerusalem when Palestinian rock-throwers attacked his car, killing him. The facts of the murder are straightforward, but not according to the New York Times.
A 'settler' in Samaria released a reality video exposing false claims about how Palestinians live compared to Israelis. So which is it - Donkey Carts or Luxury Cars?
A 'settler' in Samaria released a reality video exposing false claims about how Palestinians live compared to Israelis. So which is it - Donkey Carts or Luxury Cars?
Español
English
