Recent NYT articles about Iran and Israel aptly demonstrate Netanyahu's criticism of narrative in which 'good is portrayed as evil, evil as good.'

The paper has been having trouble explaining the answer, illuminating the challenges it faces covering the wars of Iranian aggression.

Article frames new campus policies as 'targeting Gaza protesters,' playing down the fact they were instituted to protect Jewish students from antisemitic violence. 

Original headline read, 'UN clears half the aid workers accused of taking part in the October 7 attack.' That's like writing, 'Terrorists spare four of seven buildings at World Trade Center,' according to one commentator.

'The only limit on Hamas's willingness to kill every single Jew is Israel’s power of self-defense,' wrote former U.S. ambassador David Friedman.

Major media outlets falsely accused Israel of striking a refugee camp in Rafah, ignoring evidence that the target was a Hamas command center outside a humanitarian zone.

In the op-ed, the author claims that 94% of Jewish Israelis supported the force used in Gaza.

For the Times, supporting jihad is not a bug. It’s a feature.

Controversy ensues as NY Times publishes article by Hamas official.

The New York Times retracted a headline comparing Israel to Putin's forces, citing data discrepancies.

The New York paper of record has drawn a “false moral equivalence” between those who put up posters calling for the release of hostages and those who tear the posters down, per CAMERA.

“These journalists were accomplices in crimes against humanity."

The Associated Press, CNN, the New York Times, and Reuters all published photos from the October 7 massacre, raising some serious questions.

The paper claimed it took steps with Palestinian Soliman Hijjy “to ensure he understood our concerns and could adhere to our standards.”

Aside from Baconi’s obvious unalloyed support for Palestinian terrorism, the piece is also replete with distortions and outright lies.

State Department spokesman addresses a recent New York Times column by Thomas L. Friedman claiming the "U.S. reassessment of Netanyahu’s government has begun."

Instead of prominent reference to one of the most disturbing recent killings, the paper of record noted there was 'tension.'

Instead of providing a balanced and nuanced piece of journalism, this New York Times report is full of misleading statements and claims that reek of an anti-Israel bias.

Why New York Times piece presents the Iranian regime as a victim of Israeli aggression is simply baffling.

The Times‘ biggest problem, according to the study's author, is turning a blind eye to Palestinian terror.

The New York Times' anti-Israel and anti-Semitic bias has done significant harm to the Jewish community. Here's how:

Agudath Israel begins a media campaign, including high-visibility billboards, to push back against the New York Times’ criticism of Haredi communities.

Just months after being forced to fire journalists covering Israel who publicly praised Adolf Hitler, many Jews noticed that the design of the New York Times’ crossword bore a striking resemblance to a swastika. By United with Israel Staff On Monday, antisemitism watchdog groups noticed the New York Times chose to publish a crossword puzzle... Read more »

During a time of rising antisemitism, the newspaper is 'investing significant resources to contribute to an atmosphere of hate against those most identifiably Jewish,' Agudath Israel of America stated.

A watchdog group called CAMERA performed 'basic research' using the Palestinians' own statistics to debunk the New York Times claim that Israel has 'devastat[ed]...the Gaza Strip’s fishing industry.'

Thanks to Honest Reporting's work, The New York Times stopped working with the three antisemitic freelancers.

There are several points where The New York Times should have amended the gross inaccuracies stated by Peter Beinart about Israel.

The New York Times worked with at least two more Palestinians who lauded Adolf Hitler and Palestinian terrorism.

The New York Times is all for 'the principle of equality in general' — unless and until it applies to giving equal, fair treatment to Orthodox Jewish views.

The New York Times not only focuses a disproportionate amount of attention on Israel, it promotes a disparaging image of the Jewish state.

The opportunity to portray Jews, falsely, as bloodthirsty killers resonates with audiences that have been primed with classical antisemitic tropes.

The Times demands absolute transparency for Israel in the middle of a war with a terrorist group dedicated to its destruction, yet gives World Vision a free pass on the point, applying a double standard.

'The new facility...would require the largest bunker-busting bombs in the American inventory to attack,' The New York Times reported.

As usual with the Times, the bias bleeds through in the descriptions, the framing, and the double standards.

The hit was meant as a warning to Tehran to halt the operations of a covert unit responsible for abductions and assassinations outside Iran, an intelligence official says.

The New York Times exposes its own bias again with a statement about Jewish presence in the Land of Israel that questions basic historical facts.

The New York Times recently released a documentary called Mission Hebron, which is full of lies that demonize Israel.

The 'obstacle to peace' in the Arab-Israeli conflict is the same obstacle that since 1937 has caused every Palestinian Arab leader to reject peace, before there were any 'occupied territories.'

Pro-Israel readers swarm New York Times comments section after article blames Israel for Gaza wedding debt.

The headline is framed as a question: 'Mayim Bialik Wants the Jeopardy! Job. Is She Neutral Enough?' But the viewpoint is clear enough.